So do contrasts in perception of responsibility depend upon the level of involvement? Those who experience it first hand as carriers, (or even non-carriers within a carrier family) seem to see a wider spectrum to the debate, while non-carriers or are more judgemental and build a more precise definition of their view on right and wrong.
What would the implications of the outsider’s tendency to express a simplistic moral judgement be on public opinion and policy as more and more genetic diagnoses are made?
Post a Comment