Arribus-Allyson distinguishes between two forms of blame: internal states of the person (self-blame) or ethico-moral attributions to other persons (other-oriented responsibility). Self blame is intertwined with notions of guilt, however genetic other-oriented blame in the family sphere is more complex.
Holding one’s parents culpable for biological suffering has severe implications. Not only is this an action [...]
Looking back at Hallowell’s reseach, according to the non-carriers genetic responsibility is demonstrated by taking an active approach: getting tested, disclosing the genetic information and making reproductive desicions accordingly.
On the other hand genetic determinism, which was demonstrated by many of the carriers is seen as a form of passivity in case of risk.
(image: Fatalism by [...]
Is fatalism a positive or negative approach to genetically predicted illness? All forms of fatalistic belief, exempt the individual from any personal responsibility, intentions or free will. However can we even use fatalism as a legitimate approach in light of genetic knowledge? Before genetic testing, there was no way to know exactly which genes one [...]
Also tagged belief, family, predetermined